he research results show that the profitability of Vietnam's
commercial banks in the world economic crisis is better than
the postcrisis period, as a result of special policies issued and implemented to
stabilize the economy. However, in the period 2007 - 2011, banks lend
more, hold more profitable assets and achieve higher profitability but
the quality of assets is not high, negatively affecting financial
performance in the following period. Specifically, according to the
State Bank of Vietnam, the NPL ratio increased sharply from 2012 to
2014 at 4.86%, 3.79%, 3.7% respectively, of which, the peak of NPL42
ratio of the whole system is the year 2012. Research results are
consistent with the studies of Chronopoulos et al. (2015), Lindblom
and Willesson (2010)
50 trang |
Chia sẻ: honganh20 | Ngày: 02/03/2022 | Lượt xem: 365 | Lượt tải: 0
Bạn đang xem trước 20 trang tài liệu Tóm tắt Luận án The profitability of Vietnamese commercial banks in the context of the world economic crisis, để xem tài liệu hoàn chỉnh bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
. Government needs
a different approach to responding to potential economic crises in the
future.
1.6 THESIS STRUCTURE
The content of the thesis includes 5 chapters:
Chapter 1: Introduction
Chapter 2: Theoretical basis of the impact of the economic crisis
on the profitability of commercial bank
Chapter 3: Research methodology and data
Chương 4: Research results and discussions
Chương 5: Conclusion and policy suggestions for Vietnamese
commercial banks to achieve reasonable profitability in the
context of the world economic crisis.
12
CHAPTER 2
THEORETICAL BACKGROUND OF THE IMPACTS OF
ECONOMIC CRISIS ON COMMERCIAL BANK'S
PROFITABILITY
2.1 THEORETICAL BACKGROUND OF THE ECONOMIC
CYCLE AND ECONOMIC CRISIS
2.1.1 Concept of economic cycle and economic crisis
Samuelson and Nordhaus (2007) stated that the economic
cycle is the volatility of real GDP in a three-phase order of recession,
recovery and prosperity. In which, the recession phase is the decline
13
of real gross domestic product (GDP) for two or more consecutive
quarters (the negative economic growth rate in two consecutive
quarters).
Gordon (1994) argued that the economic cycle consisted of
periods of expansion that occurred almost simultaneously in many
economic activities, and that followed by periods of crisis and periods
of recovery integrated into the expansion phase of the next cycle.
The US National Agency for Economic Research (NBER)
considered that an economic slowdown is a decline in economic
activity across the country, lasting months to more than a year. An
economic slowdown can be related to a simultaneous decline in many
economic indicators such as employment, investment, and corporate
profits, and can be associated with inflation or deflation. A severe and
long-term recession is called an economic crisis (NBER, 2010)..
2.1.2 Theories of economic cycles and economic crisis
According to the Keynesian (1936) school, stemming from
the existence of indelible uncertainty in a monetary economy, as a
result, the economy experienced periods of rapid growth and
recession, then there is the crisis. One of the implications of this view
is that the economy does not regulate itself, and the government must
act to stimulate demand when the economy weakens, and to cool it
when it gets too hot. If there is not enough money flowing into the
economy to support the refinancing process, the recession will prolong
14
and the result is economic crisis. When the economic crisis occurs, the
tightening of government spending, and the fear of lending of banks,
make the crisis more serious. Therefore, the government needs to
boost spending to increase aggregate demand in times of crisis and to
tighten spending during hot growth. For the financial market, in a
period of crisis, the central bank needs to act quickly to create market
liquidity, prevent cash hoarding, and clear capital flows in the
economy. In addition, too high savings can negatively affect the
economy because households reduce consumption, businesses do not
invest to produce more goods due to fear of not having enough demand
to consume goods they produce and are uncertain about the prospects
of the economy.
According to the post-Keynesian school, typically Minsky
(1975), there was a time where the financial system changed from
steady state to state of crisis (often called the Minsky moment). This
theory argues that financial shocks and investor misbehavior are the
cause of the financial crisis. Accordingly, the Minsky moment was
when investors, financing their portfolios by over-borrowing, were
forced to sell their best assets to repay the loan, leading to a sharp
decline in both value and liquidity in the financial market. Minsky's
view of the financial crisis is summarized in three phases as follows:
- Stage 1: This is the period when the economy recovers and develops
stably, following a shock or previous financial crisis. During this
period, investors expressed excitement and optimistic assessment of
15
the economy. Investors' psychology is quite stable, tends to choose to
invest in safe portfolios or assets. From their own capital or borrowing
from a bank, they have stable and safe profits but no sudden changes
and can afford to pay principal and interest to the bank. From such
early successes, they started to invest in assets that could bring more
returns.
- Stage 2: Based on the successes from stage 1 investing, investors
begin to expand their portfolios. A business sector can have many
investors participating and one investor participating in many different
sectors. Due to the rapidly increasing investment demand, investors
began to increase their debt. Banks lend more leading to high credit
growth, more profits but also increased risks. Credit capital poured
more into different sectors, creating price bubbles of assets. Increased
risks erode investors' profits. Since then, they can only hold on to
paying interest to banks, while principal debt becomes more difficult
and needs more time to pay.
- Stage 3: The financial bubble really exploded, causing the economy
to fall into crisis. Banks restrict lending, enhance lending terms, or
stop lending due to perceived high risks. At that time, speculation on
assets, especially high-risk assets such as securities, real estate was
frozen. Investors who are unable to pay their banks, are financially
depleted, have to sell off their assets at increasingly lower prices to
repay the banks and try to withdraw from the investment portfolio. As
a result, they run the risk of losing their capital and falling into
16
bankruptcy. Banks themselves also fell into liquidity, unable to meet
the surging demand for loans of investors as well as depositors to
increase cash withdrawals from banks.
After that, the economy started a new cycle, returned to a
stable state, prioritizing safety for phase 1. Investors limit using debt
as financial leverage, prioritizing first choice to invest in areas of high
safety, while credit growth of banks is also reduced in line with
reduced demand for loans of investors.
The Keynesian and the Post Keynesian (Minsky) schools play
a central role, the foundation of the theory in the study of this topic.
Economic crisis is cyclical, considered as a phase of economic cycle,
it is called cyclical crisis. The economic crisis that occurs locally in a
particular field is a specific crisis, such as financial crisis, credit crisis,
business crisis... Approach to economic crisis as a constituent phase
of the economic cycle is supported by the majority of well-known
economists. Therefore, in the next content, the thesis will apply in
combination these theories with profitability theories to analyze the
relationship between economic crisis and the profitability of
commercial banks. In the scope of the thesis, it is limited in the context
of the financial crisis.
2.2 THEORETICAL BACKGROUND OF THE
PROFITABILITY OF COMMERCIAL BANK
2.2.1 The views on performance and profitability of commercial
17
bank
Commercial bank’s performance can be assessed by many
methods and the profitability of commercial bank is one of the
methods to evaluate performance of commercial bank (ECB, 2010;
Yuanita, 2019). The ability to create profits is seen as a way to evaluate
the performance of commercial bank (ECB, 2010).
2.2.2 The theories of commercial bank profitability
Profitability of a bank is the indicator measuring the
efficiency of banking operations. The studies of the bank's
profitability or the bank's performance are basically based on two
theories: market power theory (MP) and the theory of efficient
structure (ES).
Market power theory
The theory of market power (MP - market power) has two
main approaches: Structure-Conduct-Performance (SCP) theory,
proposed by Chamberlin (1933) and Robinson (1933), and Relative
market power (RMP) theory, proposed by Smirlock (1985).
According to the SCP theory, the more centralized banks are, the more
able to manipulate the market by imposing high interest rates on loans
and low deposit rates due to lower levels of competition. According to
the Relative market power (RMP) theory, banks with large market
shares and differentiated products and services will be able to control
18
the market and achieve higher profits.
The theory of efficient structure
Demsetz (1973) was the first to study efficient structure
theory (ES). This theory holds that the most efficient banks get both
the profit and the higher share; banks increase profitability as an
indirect result of improved bank governance, not the power of market
benefits.
Thus, it can be seen that the market power theory (MP -
market power) states that the profitability of banks is a function of
market factors, while efficient structure theory (ES) argues that bank
performance is influenced by internal performance and governance
decisions, i.e. internal factors.
Accordingly, many researchers have relied on the above
theory to introduce some useful variables to the model of bank
profitability and most admit that the bank's profitability is one function
according to both internal and external factors (Olweny & Shipho,
2011).
2.2.3 The indicators reflect the profitability of commercial bank
Two basic ratios commonly used to evaluate profitability of
commercial bank are ROA and ROE (Nguyen Minh Kieu, 2009).
- Return on Assets (ROA). ROA is a ratio measuring the ability of
commercial banks to manage and use financial resources to create
19
profits. ROA is calculated according to the formula:
𝑅𝑂𝐴 =
𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑖𝑡 𝑎𝑓𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑡𝑎𝑥
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠
- Return on Equity (ROE). ROE is a ratio reflecting the efficiency of
equity, that is, the bank's return from equity. ROE is calculated by the
formula:
𝑅𝑂𝐸 =
𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑖𝑡 𝑎𝑓𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑡𝑎𝑥
𝐸𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑦
In the scope of the thesis, the author limits the use of two criteria,
ROA and ROE, to evaluate profitability of Vietnamese commercial
banks.
2.3 THE IMPACT OF ECONOMIC CRISIS ON
COMMERCIAL BANK'S PROFITABILITY
2.3.1 The economic crisis affects the macro economy
2.3.2 Economic crisis increases credit risk
2.3.3 Economic crisis increases liquidity risk
2.4 EMPIRICAL STUDIES
2.4.1 Factors affecting the profitability of commercial bank
In the world
In Vietnam
2.4.2 An empirical studies of the impact of the economic crisis on
20
the profitability of commercial bank
In the world
In Vietnam
2.5 DISCUSSION OF PREVIOUS STUDIES
First, regarding research objectives, studies have proved costly in the
close relationship between profitability of commercial banks and
economic crisis in recent decades (Asian financial crisis in 1997 and
the global financial crisis in 2008). These two crises, especially the
global financial crisis in 2008, have severely affected the Vietnamese
economy in general and businesses in particular. Although previous
studies have proven the impact of financial crisis (positive or
negative), there is no research that can explain why these impacts are
so closely and scientifically based on the theory and specific evidence.
According to the author's review, since these two crises, in Vietnam,
there have been a number of studies on the profitability of commercial
banks in the context of the world economic crisis, but with the
different scope and approach. Therefore, this thesis is designed to
study profitability of commercial banks in the context of world
economic crisis, and solve the following problems: (i) identify factors
affecting the profitability of commercial banks in the context of world
economic crisis and recovery period, (ii) study the differences in
commercial banks' profitability in the crisis and recovery period. (iii)
study the relationship between micro and macro factors to the
21
profitability of commercial banks, how these factors affect the
profitability of commercial banks in each period. At the same time,
research will explain the mechanism of action based on the Keynesian
view (1936).
Second, In terms of the research methodology, previous studies used
traditional estimation methods (also known as frequentist) such as
Pooled OLS, FEM, REM, GMM. These methods allow studying the
impact of micro and macro factors on the profitability of commercial
banks, but there are still many disadvantages. Specifically, the
scientific conclusions in the frequentist statistics are based on the data
set, regardless of known information (Nguyen Ngoc Thach, 2019). In
frequentist statistics, parameters are considered to be constant but
unknown. But for time series data, these parameters will change, thus
assuming constant parameters is no longer suitable. Therefore, more
broadly, in Bayesian statistics, the parameters are assumed as random
variables and follow a distribution law (van de Schoot & Depaoli,
2014; Bolstad & Curran, 2016). Bayesian conclusions based on a prior
information combined with collected data sets should have higher
accuracy. For frequentist statistics, a sufficiently large data set is
required to draw conclusions. Whereas for Bayesian statistics, making
conclusions regardless of the size of the data (Baldwin & Fellingham,
2013; Depaoli & van de Schoot, 2016; Doron & Gaudreau, 2014),
overcomes the drawback of frequentist statistics. Recently, the
Bayesian method has been interested in using by researchers around
22
the world as well as in Vietnam because of its high accuracy and
predictability in economic issues. The research on the profitability of
commercial banks in Vietnam using the Bayesian method has not been
performed by any author. Therefore, to achieve the goal is to study the
specific factors that affect the profitability of commercial banks in
different stages of the economic cycle, and evaluate fluctuations of the
profitability of commercial banks under the impact of macro shocks,
the author uses the Bayesian method to achieve the research objectives
and is a new approach compared to previous studies. Besides, with a
sample size of 30 banks and a relatively short period of time in the
context of economic crisis (2007 - 2011), the Bayesian regression
method is appropriate. Therefore, in terms of the research
methodology, the thesis ensures the novelty and does not overlap with
the previous studies.
Third, considering the scope of space and time, the thesis ensures the
inconsistency with previous studies. Most of the researches on the
profitability of commercial banks associated with the context of
economic crisis in different countries. Specifically, Andries et al
(2016) studied the relationship between the financial crisis and the
profitability of Eastern and Western European commercial banks from
2004 to 2013 through time dummy variables (Dummy = 1 in crisis
period 2009 - 2013). In Vietnam, there are a number of works
assessing the impact of the financial crisis in 2008 to the profitability
of commercial banks such as Le (2017), related to the topic, with a
23
sample of 40 banks from 2005 to 2015 and dummy variable (D = 1)
refers to the crisis in 2008 and 2009. Or the study of Nguyen Anh Tu
and Pham Tri Nghia (2018), with a sample of 27 banks from 2005 to
2017 using dummy variables (D = 1) to indicate the crisis in 2008 and
2009, ie is the bottom of the crisis. According to the author's review,
up to now, no research in Vietnam has been done associated with both
the crisis and the recovery period to fully assess the impact of the
factors in each stage on the profitability of commercial banks.
Therefore, the scope of research in addition to finding out the impact
of the entire crisis cycle on commercial banks' profitability. The thesis
also studies the impact of factors on profitability in the entire period
(2007 to 2018) and divided into two specific phases corresponding to
two phases of the world economic cycle - the crisis period ( 2007 to
2011) and the post-crisis period (2012 to 2018). Therefore, the
research scope of the thesis includes the scope of space and time which
does not overlap with previous studies.
The above analysis proves that the thesis has different
subjects, objectives, methods, and scope of the research compared to
previous studies. In addition, the thesis also ensures the novelty,
scientific and highly applicable, especially in the context that the
Vietnamese economy in general and commercial banks in particular
still have many potential risks, uncertainty, especially in the current
world economic instability.
CONCLUSION OF CHAPTER 2
24
In chapter 2, the author presents the theoretical background of
the impact of economic crisis on the profitability of commercial banks.
Besides, the author systematizes relevant domestic and foreign
research projects to find scientific gaps in research.
CHAPTER 3
RESEARCH METHOD AND DATA
3.1 RESEARCH DESIGN
3.2 RESEARCH METHOD
3.2.1 Bayesian method
To analyze the profitability of Vietnamese commercial banks in the
context of the world economic crisis, Bayesian method applied.
From conditional probabilities:
p(A|B) =
p(A, B)
p(B)
We have Bayes' theorem:
p(A|B) =
p(B|A)p(A)
p(B)
Where:
p(A|B): Posterior probability, it is necessary to find the hypothetical
probability A given by the data collected
25
p(B|A): The likelihood of the data, probability of data collected under
the correct hypothesis A (data collected)
p(A): Prior probability: Probability of the hypothesis A that we
believe has occurred (true) before the data is collected.
p(B): Constant, probability of the data
A, B are random vectors
3.2.2 The superiority of the Bayesian method over the frequentist
method
First, Bayesian analysis is a powerful analytical tool for statistical
modeling, interpretation of results, and prediction of data.
Second, the universality of the Bayesian approach can be viewed as a
methodological advantage over the traditional approach..
Third, in Bayesian analysis, we can use prior information, either belief
or empirical evidence, in the data model to obtain a more balanced
outcome for a particular problem.
Fourth, by using the knowledge of the entire posterior distribution of
the model parameters, Bayesian inference is much more
comprehensive and flexible than traditional inference..
Fifth, Bayesian method can be used to simulate many models,
including complex functions with arbitrary precision..
26
Sixth, Bayesian inference provides a simpler and more intuitive
explanation of outcomes in terms of probabilities.
Seventh, the Bayesian model satisfies the probability principle,
assuming that information in a sample is fully represented by the
probability function (Berger và Wolpert 1988).
Finally, as mentioned briefly earlier, the estimated accuracy in
Bayesian analysis is not limited by sample size - Bayesian simulation
methods can provide an arbitrary level of accuracy and are not affected
by limitations such as aucorrelation, endogenous, heteroskedasticity
that the frequentist method encounters.
3.3 RESEARCH MODEL
3.3.1 Research process
3.3.2 Research model proposed
From the overall theoretical background presented and inherited the
research model of Sufian (2011), and the previous studies are
reviewed in chapter 2, the author proposes research models in the
thesis, as follows:
Table 3.1. Proposed models in the thesis
,
Model 1
ROA = ∝0 + ∝1SIZE + ∝2LOAN
+ ∝3LLP + ∝4DEP + ∝5LIQUI
27
+ ∝6INT + ∝7OPE + ∝8CAP +
∝9INF+ ∝10GGDP + ε1
Stage: 2007 -
2011
Model 2
ROE = β0 + β1SIZE + β2LOAN
+ β3LLP + β4DEP + β5LIQUI +
β6INT + β 7OPE + β8CAP +
β9INF+ β10GGDP + u1
Model 3
ROA = ∝0 + ∝1SIZE + ∝2LOAN
+ ∝3LLP + ∝4DEP + ∝5LIQUI
+ ∝6INT + ∝7OPE + ∝8CAP +
∝9INF+ ∝10GGDP + ε2
Stage : 2012
- 2018
Model 4
ROE = β0 + β1SIZE + β2LOAN
+ β3LLP + β4DEP + β5LIQUI +
β6INT + β 7OPE + β8CAP +
β9INF+ β10GGDP + u2
Model 5
ROA = ∝0 + ∝1SIZE + ∝2LOAN
+ ∝3LLP + ∝4DEP + ∝5LIQUI
+ ∝6INT + ∝7OPE + ∝8CAP +
∝9INF+ ∝10GGDP +
∝11DUMMY+ ε3
Stage : 2007
- 2018
Model 6
ROE = β0 + β1SIZE + β2LOAN
+ β3LLP + β4DEP + β5LIQUI +
β6INT + β 7OPE + β8CAP +
β9INF+ β10GGDP + β
11DUMMY + u3
28
Source: author’s synthesis
Table 3.2. Measure the variables used in the model
variable Formula for calculation
Dependent
variable
ROA Profit after tax/total assets
ROE Profit after tax/equity
Independent
variable
SIZE Logarithm of bank total assets
CAP Equity/total assets
LOAN Total loan/total assets
LLP Loan loss provision/total loans
LIQUI Liquid assets/total assets
DEP deposite/total assets
INT Interest expense/total liabilities
OPE Operating expense/total assets
INFL Inflation
GGDP GDP growth
DUMMY
Get 1 for the crisis period (2007 - 2011)
and 0 for the post-crisis period
Source: author’s synthesis
3.3.3 Research hypothesis
29
On the basis of systematizing the fundamental theories and
empirical studies presented by the author in Chapter 2, the research
hypotheses on profitability of Vietnamese commercial banks in the
context of the economic crisis. gender, aggregated as follows:
Table 3.3. Summary variables used in the research model
Independent
variable
Notation Previous studies Expected
Bank size SIZE
Sufian (2011),
Alexiou and
Sofoklis (2009),
Kosmidou et al.
(2007), Nguyen
Pham Nha Truc and
Nguyen Pham Thien
Thanh (2016).
+
Bank capital CAP
Tran Viet Dung
(2014), Alexiou and
Sofoklis (2009),
Petria et al. (2013),
Rahman et al.
(2015), Gyulai and
+
30
Szucs (2017),
Berger (1995).
Loan loss
provision
LLP
Iacobelli (2016),
Sufian (2011),
Anathasoglou et al.
(2008), Alexiou and
Sofoklis (2009),
Tran Viet Dung
(2014).
-
Total loans
Sufian (2011), Le
(2017), Zhang and
Dong (2011),
Rahman et al.
(2015).
+
Liquid assets LIQUI
Kohlscheen et al.
(2018), Kosmidou et
al. (2005), Ndoka et
al. (2016), Bassey
and Moses (2015),
Tran Thi Thanh Nga
(2018).
+
Deposite DEP
Sufian (2011), Lim
and Randhawa
+
31
(2005), Zhang and
Dong (2011).
Interest expense INT
Yao et al. (2018),
Islam vand
Nishiyama (2016),
Dietrich and
Wanzenried (2011).
-
Operating
expense
OPE
Batten and Vo
(2019), Sufian
(2011), Kosmidou
(2008), (2016)
-
Inflation INFLAT
Rahman et al.
(2015), Le (2017),
Tran Viet Dung
(2014).
-
GDP growth GGDP
Kohlscheen et
al.(2018),
Athanasoglou et al.
(2008), Trujillo-
Ponce (2013),
Nguyen Pham Nha
Truc and Nguyen
Pham Thien Thanh
+
32
(2016), Le (2017),
Tran Viet Dung
(2014).
World economic
crisis
DUMMY
Chronopoulos et al.
(2015), Lindblom
and Willesson
(2010), Kamarudin
et al. (2016).
+
Notes: (-) negative correlation, (+) positive correlation
Source: author’s synthesis
3.4 DATA
3.4.1 Research data description
The thesis uses unbalanced panel data from 2007 to 2018.
Data collected from financial statements of 30 Vietnamese
commercial banks, macroeconomic data of the General Statistics
Office, State Bank of Vietnam in the period from 2007 to 2018.
3.4.2 Model test
In order to ensure that Bayes inference based on MCMC
model simulation is reasonable, the study is based on the convergence
diagnosis of MCMC chain.
33
CONCLUSION OF CHAPTER 3
In chapter 3, the author presented in detail the research methodology,
research model, research data and model test.
Chapter 4 presents the results of the study and discusses the results
obtained.
CHAPTER 4
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
4.1 THE PROFITABILITY OF VIETNAMES COMMERCIAL
BANKS DURING THE WORLD ECONOMIC CRISIS
4.1.1 Descriptive statistics and matrix correlation
4.1.2 Return on assets (ROA)
Table 4.3. Summary of regression results
Mean
coefficient
Std. dev MCSE
SIZE 0,0028 0,0238 0,0002
LLP -0,2124 3,1773 0,0307
LOAN 0,0059 0,2537 0,0025
34
CAP 0,0986 0,3433 0,0974
DEP 0,0157 0,1555 0,0015
LIQUI 0,0026 0,2176 0,0021
INT -0,0114 0,9827 0,0021
OPE -0,3451 3,5132 0,0035
INFLAT -0,0136 0,4035 0,0040
GGDP 0,1753 1,8488 0,0184
_cons -0,0932 0,8183 0,0081
var 0,0399 0,0051 0,0000
Source: author’s calculation
4.1.3 Return on equity (ROE)
Table 4.5. Summary of regression results
Mean
coefficient
Std. dev MCSE
SIZE 0,0453 0,0252 0,0002
LLP -4,1234 3,3891 0,0344
35
LOAN 0,1965 0,2747 0,0027
CAP 0,3312 0,3634 0,0036
DEP 0,1119 0,1653 0,0016
LIQUI 0,0684 0,2348 0,0023
INT 0,0287 1,0515
Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:
- tom_tat_luan_an_the_profitability_of_vietnamese_commercial_b.pdf