Ultrasonic vibrating tank SW60H Elma 38 kHz. Brabender 2-screw
mixer. SM210 injection molding machine, SHR super mixer, Coperion
Keya molten mixer, injection molding machine M-70A-DM for mechanical
samples. FT-IR Infrared Spectrophotometer IMPACT-410. D8 Advance
Bruker X-ray diffraction spectrometer. DSC, TGA Labsys Stearam. SEM
Hitachi S4800. TEM JEM-1010. Tinius Olsen H100KT versatile bending
compressors and impact resistance Radmana ITR 2000
28 trang |
Chia sẻ: honganh20 | Ngày: 03/03/2022 | Lượt xem: 387 | Lượt tải: 0
Bạn đang xem trước 20 trang tài liệu Surveying some factors affecting the physical and chemical properties of polymer nanocomposite materials on the basis of polyamide 6, polycarbonate and multi - Wall carbon nanotubes, để xem tài liệu hoàn chỉnh bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
MINISTRY OF EDUCATION
AND TRAINING
VIETNAM ACADEMY OF
SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
GRADUATE UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
-----------------------------
Ha Van Thuc
SURVEYING SOME FACTORS AFFECTING THE PHYSICAL
AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF POLYMER
NANOCOMPOSITE MATERIALS ON THE BASIS OF
POLYAMIDE 6, POLYCARBONATE AND MULTI-WALL
CARBON NANOTUBES
Major: Theory Chemistry and Physical Chemistry
Code: 9 44 01 19
THESIS OF CHEMISTRY DOCTOR
Ha noi – 2019
The thesis is completed at: Institute for Tropical Technology, Vietnam
Academy of Science and Technology
«
Science instructors:
1. Associate Professor. Dr. Tran Thi Thanh Van
2. Dr. Le Van Thu
LIST OF ARTICLES OF AUTHOR
1. Ha Van Thuc, Tran Thi Thanh Van, Ngo Cao Long, Le Van Thu,
Study on preparation of PA6/PC/SEBS/SEBS-g-MA/CNT materials by
melt mixing method, Part 1: Manufacturing masterbatch, Vietnam
Journal of Chemistry, Vol 56, 07-2018, 145-149.
2. Ha Van Thuc, Tran Thi Thanh Van, Ngo Cao Long, Le Van Thu,
Study on preparation of PA6/PC/SEBS/SEBS-g-MA/CNT materials by
melt mixing method, Part 2: Optimization of processing parameter,
Vietnam Journal of Chemistry, Vol 56, 07-2018, 150-154.
3. Huynh Anh Hoang, Le Van Thu, Ha Van Thuc, Modification and
investigation of properties of carbon nanotubes prepared from
Vietnamese liquefied petroleum gas, Vietnam Journal of Chemistry,
Vol 52 (6), 12-2014, 717-722.
4. Ha Van Thuc, Tran Thi Thanh Van, Ngo Cao Long, Le Van Thu,
Investigation of the effect of carbon nanotubes on the properties of
blend materials PA6/PC/SEBS/SEBS-g-MA, Journal of Chemistry,
Physics and Biology, Vol 23, 3/2018, 89-93.
5. Ha Van Thuc, Tran Thi Thanh Van, Ngo Cao Long, Le Van Thu,
Improve the compatibility of polyamide 6 and polycarbonate on the
basis of using SEBS and SEBS-g-MA compatibilizers, Journal of
Chemistry, Physics and Biology, Accepting.
1
A. INTRODUCTION TO THE THESIS
1. The urgency and purpose of the thesis research
- The urgency of the thesis: Today, developing polymer nanocomposite
materials on the basis of thermoplastic, thermosetting reinforced with
nanomaterials to create good impact-resistant products is always studied. In
fact, thermoplastics polyamides 6 (PA6), polycarbonates (PC) have been
used as materials to produce many shockproof devices, especially in the
field of national security, such as caps, armor, and body cladding. The
equipment for that soldier requires good impact resistance, durability and
lightness. PA6 has some preeminent properties such as durability with
hydrocarbon solvents, wear resistance, good fatigue, toughness, high
thermal stability, easy processing. The PC has the outstanding feature of
high optical transparency, better impact resistance than most other
thermoplastics. Among high-performance nanomaterials for thermoplastic
resins, carbon nanotubes (CNT) are a typical agent. CNT has a very high
and light mechanical strength. Therefore, if PA6, PC, and CNT are
incorporated into a nanocomposite polymer, it is possible to create a
potential material to produce impact-resistant equipment for the armed
forces.
- Purpose: Successful fabrication of polymer nanocomposite on the basis of
PA6, PC thermoplastics, and CNT reinforcement to effectively apply the
material system to the production of body protection equipment for the army
forces.
2. Research content of the thesis
(1) Fabrication of PA6/PC blend on the basis of using two
compatible substances, SEBS and SEBS-g-MA.
(2) CNT denaturation then fabricated polymer nanocomposite based
on CNT modified with PA6/PC/SEBS/SEBS-g-MA.
(3) Optimize machining parameters and determine suitable mixing
sequences for polymer nanocomposite manufacturing.
2
(4) Testing production of some impact-resistant products (hand
covers, helmets) from fabricated polymer nanocomposite materials.
3. Scientific and practical significance, new contributions of the thesis
- Evaluation of dispersion level, interoperability between components and
mechanical properties of polymer blends PA6/PC/SEBS/SEBS-g-MA and
polymer nanocomposites PA6/PC/SEBS/SEBS-g-MA/CNT.
- Construct the mixing process and the appropriate technological parameters
for polymer nanocomposite manufacturing.
- Experimental producting some anti-shock products used in the field of
national security to meet the specific product standards of police and
military.
4. The layout of the thesis
The thesis has 138 pages including 6 sections: Opening 2 pages;
Chapter 1 - Overview 38 pages; Chapter 2 - Experiment and research
methods 14 pages; Chapter 3-Results and discussion 61 pages; List of works
of the author 1 page; References 11 pages; Appendix 10 pages..
B. THESIS CONTENT
CHAPTER 1: OVERVIEW
The author has gathered 103 references on the content and research
objects of the thesis including: Characteristics and applications of PA6, PC
and some other thermoplastic. Overview of the situation of research,
manufacture and application of polymer blends of thermoplastic resins with
compatible substances, as well as polymer nanocomposites with
thermoplastic matrix, especially PA6, PC with reinforcement CNT. Since
then, the following conclusions are drawn:
- PA6, PC is commonly used to make blend polymer and polymer
nanocomposite such as PA6/PP, PA6/PE, PA6/PC, PA6/CNT, PC/CNT.
Types of composites and blends have mostly improved impact resistance,
elongation, breaking strength, etc. CNT has the ability to effectively
enhance physical and mechanical properties for many polymer
3
nanocomposites. However, the positive effect of CNT is only clearly
promoted when it is denatured to reduce the phenomenon of shrinkage,
increase dispersion capacity and connect with the plastic matrix.
- Many block polymers, graft polymers are used to make interactions
between polymers in polymer blend, polymer nanocomposite. Typically,
graft copolymers like PE-g-MA, PP-g-MA, EPR-g-MA, SEBS-g-MA,
CHAPTER 2. EXPERIMENT AND RESEARCH METHOD
2.1. Materials
PA6: MFI 10g/10min (230 0C, 2,16 kg), 1,36 g/cm3. PC: MFI
10,5g/10min (3000C, 1,2 kg), 1,2 g/cm3. SEBS: Kraton 1652, 0,91g/cm3,
20000u. SEBS-g-MA: SEBS2% anhydride maleic, Kraton 1901, 29%
Styrene. MWCNT: CVD, d = 10÷ 80 nm, l = 10÷50µm, cleanness > 95%.
2.2. Devices
Ultrasonic vibrating tank SW60H Elma 38 kHz. Brabender 2-screw
mixer. SM210 injection molding machine, SHR super mixer, Coperion
Keya molten mixer, injection molding machine M-70A-DM for mechanical
samples. FT-IR Infrared Spectrophotometer IMPACT-410. D8 Advance
Bruker X-ray diffraction spectrometer. DSC, TGA Labsys Stearam. SEM
Hitachi S4800. TEM JEM-1010. Tinius Olsen H100KT versatile bending
compressors and impact resistance Radmana ITR 2000.
2.3. Experimental methods
2.3.1. Prepare polymer blend PA6/PC/SEBS/SEBS-g-MA
Samples PA6, PC, PA6 / PC, PA6 / PC / SEBS-g-MA, PA6 / PC /
SEBS / SEBS-g-MA are prepared with varying components. The samples
were mixed at the normal temperature and then added simultaneously to the
2-screw melt mixing chamber.
2.3.2. Prepare polymer nanocomposites PA6/PC/SEBS/SEBS-g-MA/CNT
4
2.3.2.1. CNT modification: CNT and HNO3 (63%) is mixed, ultrasonic
vibrating, heating and stirring. The mixture is diluted with deionized water
and filtered. Dry the sample in a vacuum oven.
2.3.2.2. Prepare polymer nanocomposites : Polymer nanocomposites is
made through 2 stages: Drying and dehumidifying moisture, melt mixing.
2.3.3. Determination of polymer nanocomposites processing parameters
Materials including PA6, PC, SEBS/SEBS-g-MA and CNT
(modified) are mixed in proportion to 80/20/10/10 / 1,5 (pkl). Optimal
sample machining parameters are determined including temperature, time
and screw speed.
2.3.4. Prepare masterbatch of polymer nanocomposite
2.3.4.1. Process 1: PA6/PC/SEBS/SEBS-g-MA/CNT with the ratio of
80/20/10/10/1,5 (pkl) corresponding is mixed simultaneously to make
polymer nanocomposite.
2.3.4.2. Process 2: In stage 1 only PA6/SEBS/SEBS-g-MA/CNT are mixed.
At stage 2 PC is added.
2.3.4.3. Process 3: In stage 1, only PC/SEBS/SEBS-g-MA/CNT are mixed.
In stage 2 PA6 is added.
2.3.5. Test production
2.3.5.1. Using numerical simulation method: The impact resistance of
polymer nanocomposite materials is evaluated by Autodyn Ansys 12
simulation software.
2.3.5.2. Production of hand-covers and helmets: Hand covers and helmet
after determining thickness and mold, they are test manufactured.
2.4. Methods of surveying the structure and properties of samples and
testing product
Survey of sample microstructures: FT-IR, XRD, EDX, viscosity flow
of polymers, TGA and DSC. SEM, TEM morphology survey.
Determination of mechanical properties: tensile strength, elongation,
Charpy impact resistance according to ISO 179-1: 2010.
5
CHAPTER 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
3.1. Survey of structure and properties of polymer blends
PA6/PC/SEBS/SEBS-g-MA
3.1.1. Survey the physical properties of blend PA6/PC
3.1.2. Survey mechanical properties of blend PA6/PC/SEBS/SEBS-g-MA
3.1.2.1. Survey the influence of SEBS-g-MA on the mechanical properties of
PA6 and PC
The amount of SEBS-g-MA at about 10 (pkl) in blend PA6/PC can be
a suitable level to facilitate the connection of PA6-PC phase, thereby
increasing the mechanical properties of blend compared to original
polymers.
3.1.2.2. Survey mechanical properties of blend PA6/PC/SEBS-g-MA
Figure 3.3: Change of
impact strength of blends
PA6/PC/SEBS-g-MA with
corresponding ratio x / 100-x
/ y with y = 0 ÷ 20 (pkl)
The impact strength and
elongation of the blend are
much lower than the original
polymers due to the
incompatibility of PA6 and
PC.
Figure 3.1. The change of impact strength of blend
PA6/PC according to the ratio of the plastic
Figure 3.2: Change of impact
strength of PA6/SEBS-g-MA and
PC/SEBS-g-MA blends when
SEBS-g-MA loading changes
6
3.1.2.3. Survey mechanical properties of blend PA6/PC/SEBS/SEBS-g-MA
3.1.3. Survey microstructure of blends PA6/PC/SEBS/SEBS-g-MA
Figure 3.5: Fractured SEM image of blend
samples: (a) PA6 / PC 80/20, (b) PA6 / PC
/ SEBS-g-MA 80/20/20 and (c) PA6 / PC /
SEBS / SEBS-g-MA 80/20/10/10 (pkl)
3.1.4. Surveying the torque of blends PA6/PC/SEBS/SEBS-g-MA
Figure 3.4: The change of
mechanical properties of
blend PA6/PC/SEBS/SEBS-
g-MA in proportion to SEBS
/ SEBS-g-MA
(a) (b)
(c)
Figure 3.6: Torque of blends:
sample 1: PA6/PC 80/20;
sample 2: PA6/PC/SEBS-g-
MA 80/20/20 and sample
3: PA6/PC/SEBS/SEBS-g-
MA 80/20/10/10
7
3.1.5. Infrared spectrum analysis of samples
Figure 3.7: FTIR spectra of blends
(a) PA6/PC/SEBS-g-MA; (b) PA6/PC
The increase in intensity of
peaks may be due to chemical
interactions occurring
between PA6 and SEBS-g-
MA. The end amine groups
(–NH2) of PA6 interacted
with the maleic anhydride
fraction (–MA) in the
compatibilizer to form imit
groups.
3.1.6. Interactive mechanism and dispersion pattern of the components in
blend PA6/PC/SEBS/SEBS-g-MA
Figure 3.8: The pattern of
components distribution in blend,
compatibilizers SEBS/SEBS-g-MA
play a role as a bridge connecting
PA6 matrix to PC
Figure 3.9: Interactive
mechanism to form a bridge
between PA6 matrix and PC of
SEBS/SEBS-g-MA in blend
PA6/PC/SEBS/SEBS-g-MA
8
3.2. Survey of structure and properties of polymer nanocomposite
based on blend PA6/PC/SEBS/SEBS-g-MA and CNT reinforcement
3.2.1. Structure and properties of CNT before and after modification
3.2.1.1. Survey of microstructure of CNT through SEM images
Figure 3.10: SEM images of CNT: (a) before and (b) after modification
(a) (b)
Figure 3.11: SEM image describes
the distribution state of CNT
after modification
Figure 3.12: SEM image
determines the size of fiber CNT
after modification
(a) (b)
Figure 3.13: TEM image of CNT: (a) before and (b) after modification
9
3.2.1.2. Infrared spectrum and X-ray dispersion spectrum of CNT
Figure 3.14: FTIR spectra of CNT before (a) and after (b) modification
CNT nature d (A0) CNT modified d (A0) Elements
3,423 3,409 C
2,096 2,104 Fe3C
2,021 2,024 Fe3C.n-Fe/C
Figure 3.15: X-ray diagram of CNT before (a) and after (b) modification
CNT nature CNT modified
(a)
(a) (b)
(b)
10
Elements Weight
(%)
Atomic
(%)
Elements Weight
(%)
Atomic
(%)
C 92,35 98,42 C 85,85 90,53
Fe 0,44 0,10 Fe 0,35 0,08
O 10,91 8,64
Figure 3.16: EDX results of CNT before and after modification
3.2.1.3. Thermal properties of CNT before and after modification
Figure 3.17: Results of thermal analysis in the air environment of CNT
before (a) and after modification (b)
3.2.2. Structure and properties of polymer nanocomposite
PA6/PC/SEBS/SEBS-g-MA/CNT
3.2.2.1. Effect of CNT on the mechanical properties of polymer
nanocomposite PA6/PC/SEBS/SEBS-g-MA/CNT
(a) (b)
Figure 3.18: Change of
mechanical properties of
polymer nanocomposite
when changing CNT
loading
11
3.2.2.2. Survey thermal properties of samples
3.2.2.3. Investigating the morphology of samples
Nnb
(a) (b)
PA6/PC 80/20
PA6/PC/SEBS/SEBS-g-MA
80/20/10/10
PA6/PC/SEBS/SEBS-g-
MA/CNT 80/20/10/10/1,5
Figure 3.19:
Thermal
analysis
diagram of
PA6/PC/SEBS/
SEBS-g-MA and
PA6/PC/SEBS/
SEBS-g-
MA/CNT
Figure 3.20: Surface SEM images of polymer nanocomposites
PA6/PC/SEBS/SEBS-g-MA/CNT have the proportions of 80/20/10/10 /x
respectively with x (a) 0, respectively (b) 1,5 and (c) 2,0 (pkl)
(c)
12
3.3. Optimizing parameters in preparing polymer nanocomposite
PA6/PC/SEBS/SEBS-g-MA/CNT
3.3.1. Effect of melt mixing temperature on structure and mechanical
properties of polymer nanocomposite
3.3.1.1. Mechanical properties of polymer nanocomposite
3.3.1.2. Structural morphology of polymer nanocomposite
3.3.2. Effect of mixing time to the structure and mechanical properties of
polymer nanocomposite
3.3.2.1. Mechanical properties of polymer nanocomposite
(b) (a)
Figure 3.21: Effect of
melting temperature
on the mechanical
properties of polymer
nanocomposite
Figure 3.22: SEM image of
polymer nanocomposites
manufactured at mixing
temperature: (a) 250 oC
and (b) 260 oC
Figure 3.23: Effect of
mixing time on the
mechanical properties of
polymer nanocomposite
13
3.3.2.2. Structural morphology of polymer nanocomposite
3.3.3. Effect of screw speed on structure and mechanical properties of
polymer nanocomposite
3.3.3.1. Mechanical properties of polymer nanocomposite
3.3.3.2Structural morphology of polymer nanocomposite
3.4. Manufacturing masterbatch of polymer nanocomposite
PA6/PC/SEBS/SEBS-g-MA/CNT
No. Location Temperature (oC) Table 3.1: Temperature of
chambers in the injection
molding machine to
prepare polymer
nanocomposites
1 Nozzle 260
2 T1 260
3 T2 257
4 T3 253
5 T4 250
(a) (b)
(a) (b)
Figure 3.24: Surface SEM
images of polymers
nanocomposite with mixing
time: (a) 10 and (b) 15 (mins)
Figure 3.25: Effect of screw speed
on mechanical properties of
polymer nanocomposites
PA6/PC/SEBS/SEBS-g-MA/CNT
Figure 3.26: SEM images
of polymer nanocomposite
were prepared with
mixing speed: (a) 50 rpm
and (b) 70 rpm
14
Figure 3.27: Materials mixing procedures for manufacturing polymer
nanocomposite
3.4.1. Survey mechanical properties of polymer nanocomposite prepared
by different procedures
3.4.2. Morphological survey of polymer nanocomposite is made according
to different procedures
Figure 3.29: SEM images of polymer nanocomposites are manufactured
by different masterbatch creation procedures
(1) (3) (2)
Figure 3.28: Mechanical
properties of polymer
nanocomposites
PA6/PC/SEBS/SEBS-g-
MA/CNT prepared different
procedures
Procedure 1 Procedure 2 Procedure 3
15
3.4.3. Survey the time of mixing PA6 into masterbatch
3.5. Application of polymer nanocomposite PA6 / PC / SEBS / SEBS-g-
MA / CNT to produce some anti-impact products
3.5.1. The results use numerical simulation methods to determine the
optimal thickness for products
3.5.1.1. Results of numerical simulation for helmets
a) Results of building geometric models and model meshing:
Figure 3.31: Geometry model of helmet
0,01 mm 0,02 mm 0,04 mm
(a)
(b) (c)
Figure 3.30: Influence of
mixing time PA6 into
masterbatch PC/CNT on
mechanical properties of
polymer nanocomposites
Figure 3.32: Results of helmet model meshing by the following methods:
(a) Tetrahedrons, (b) Dominant quad / tri, (c) Dominant All quad
16
b) Select material parameters and impact simulation calculation results
1 State equation Shock Table 3.2: Polymer
nanocomposite
standard model 2 Durable model von Mises
3 Destruction model Hydro (Pmin)
Table 3.3: Parameters of state equation
Equation of State Shock
Reference density 1.14000E+00 (g/cm3 )
Gruneisen coefficient 8.70000E-01 (none )
Parameter C1 2.29000E+03 (m/s )
Parameter S1 1.63000E+00 (none )
Strength von Mises
Shear Modulus 3.68000E+06 (kPa )
Yield Stress 5.00000E+04 (kPa )
Failure Hydro (Pmin)
Hydro Tensile Limit -1.00000E+06 (kPa )
Reheal Yes
Erosion None
Maximum Expansion 1.00000E-01 (none )
Minimum Density Factor (SPH) 2.00000E-01 (none )
Figure 3.33: Characteristics of helmet
structure changes during impact
17
Figure 3.34: Results of simulated
collision calculation of helmet: (a)
impact stress at collision speed of
10 m/s, (b) impact stress at
collision speed of 20 m/s, (c) helmet
deformation
c) The survey results of the effect of materials producing helmets
Figure 3.35: Change in impact energy during the collision of helmets
made from different materials
(a) (b)
(c)
PA6 PA6/SEBS-g-MA
PA6/PC/SEBS/SEBS-g-MA
18
d) Results of surveying the thickness of helmets
Figure 3.36: Deformation of helmets with different thickness
3.5.1.2. Results of numerical simulation for hand covers
a) Results of building geometric models and model meshing
HexDominant quad/tri,
0,01 mm
Hex Dominant quad/tri,
0,05 mm
(a)
(b)
19
Tetrahedrons, 0,01 mm
Hex Dominant quad/tri,
0,02 mm
Figure 3.37: Geometric model and method of dividing suitable mesh of
covering: (a) shoulder covers, (b) hand covers, (c) elbow covers, (d) arm
covers
b) Select material parameters and impact simulation calculation results
Figure 3.38: Result of calculating stress and deformation in collision of
the hand covers: (a) collision speed is 10 m/s, (b) collision speed is 20 m/s
(c)
(d)
(a) (b)
20
d) The survey results of the thickness of the hand covers
Figure 3.39: Deformation of hand covers with different thickness
3.5.2. Test producing hand covers and helmet using polymer
nanocomposite PA6/PC/SEBS/SEBS-g-MA/CNT
Table 3.4: Temperature in heating chambers in polymer nanocomposite
extruder
Chamber Nozzle T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T9 T10
Temp
(oC)
260 260 258 258 256 256 254 254 252 252 250
Table 3.5: Temperature in the compartments of the SM210 injection
molding machine to produc test goods from nanocomposite materials
Nozzle T1 T2 T3 T4 T5
260oC 258oC 256oC 254oC 252oC 250oC
21
Figure 3.40: Helmet and hand covers test products
3.5.3. Actual testing of quality helmet and hand covers products
3.5.3.1. Testing mechanical properties
Figure 3.41: Mechanical properties of test products and laboratory
polymer nanocomposite materials
3.5.3.2. Testing against beating sticks
22
Table 3.6: Anti-impact results of test products
Products
Results
Helmet Hand covers
Cracking
phenomenon
No cracks and no
scratches
No cracking
Product structure
Good elasticity, no
distortion, the inner
helmet system does
not change.
Good elasticity, no
distortion
3.5.3.3. Test of anti-guillotine knives
Table 3.7: Results of the anti-guillotine test of the test product
Products
Results
Helmet Hand covers
Cracking
phenomenon
No cracks and no
scratches
No cracking
Product
structure
Good elasticity, no
distortion
Good elasticity, no
distortion
Depth of slash 1,25 mm 1,05 mm
3.5.3.4. Compare specifications between test products and standard
products
Table 3.8: Mechanical properties of test products compared to standards
Objects Test products Standards
Helmet Tensile strength: 111 MPa
Impact strength: 787 J/m
Weight ≤ 0,5 kg
Tensile strength ≥ 40 MP a
Impact strength ≥ 400 J / m
Weight ≤ 0,65 kg
23
Against the beating sticks
and knives of cutting
according to the standards
of the Ministry of Public
Security
Against the beating sticks and
knives of cutting according to
the standards of the Ministry
of Public Security
Hand
covers
Tensile strength: 111 MPa
Impact strength: 787 J/m
Weight ≤ 0.75 kg
Against the beating sticks
and knives of cutting
according to the standards
of the Ministry of Public
Security
Tensile strength ≥ 38 MP a
Impact resistance ≥ 500 J/m
Weight ≤ 0,85 kg
Against the beating sticks and
knives of cutting according to
the standards of the Ministry
of Public Security
GENERAL CONCLUSIONS
1) Polymer blend PA6/PC/SEBS/SEBS-g-MA with the corresponding ratios
of 80/20/10/10 (pkl) have achieved many mechanical properties superior to
polymer blend PA6/PC. The impact strength of PA6/PC polymer blends
with and without compatibilizers were 670,5 J/m and 50,2 J/m respectively.
2) Polymers nanocomposite PA6/PC/SEBS/SEBS-g-MA/CNT have the rate
of 80/20/10/10/1,5 (pkl) with many changes in mechanical properties
compared to polymer blend PA6/PC/SEBS/SEBS-g-MA has the same ratio.
Impact strength and tensile strength of polymers nanocomposite with 1,5
(pkl) CNT corresponding to 730,5 J/m and 92 MPa. CNT reinforcement
tends to disperse into PA6. The appearance of CNT in thermoplastic also
significantly increases thermal stability compared to the original
thermoplastic resins, as well as polymer blends with similar components.
3) Polymer nanocomposite PA6/PC/SEBS/SEBS-g-MA/CNT is processed
with optimal parameters: melting temperature of 260 oC, mixing speed of
24
70 rpm and mixing time of 15 minutes. The manufactured polymer
nanocomposite achieves the best mechanical properties, impact strength and
tensile strength corresponding to 777 J/m and 98 MPa.
4) The most suitable mixing sequence for preparing polymer nanocomposite
is to use the masterbatch PC/SEBS/SEBS-g-MA/CNT melted mixing with
PA6. The proportion of components is 20/10/10/1,5 and 80 PA6
respectively (pkl). Masterbatch is melted for 6 minutes, the polymer
nanocomposite is melted for 9 minutes.
5) Calculating numerical simulation with geometric model, elemental
meshing method and physicochemical parameters of polymer
nanocomposite by Autodyn Ansys 12 software has determined the optimal
structure of the test production products (helmet and hand covers). Actual
test results show a high suitability for the mechanical properties of the test
products compared to the polymer nanocomposite manufactured in the
laboratory. The test products meet the technical requirements in accordance
with the helmet and hand covers sets of the Ministry of Public Security.
Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:
- surveying_some_factors_affecting_the_physical_and_chemical_p.pdf