Regarding the organizational apparatus to perform the state
owner function: Regarding the policies and laws, in the period of
restructuring 2011-2015 and from 2016 to now, there have been many
innovations in this content. Conclusion No. 40-TB / TW dated
September 14, 2017 of the Politburo on the project "Establish a
specialized agency to act as the owner representative for state-owned
enterprises and state capital in enterprises". Therefore, the Government
has established a Committee to manage state capital at enterprises
according to the Government's Resolution No. 09 / NQ-CP dated
February 3, 2018
- Regarding the transfer of the right to represent the owner of state
capital in an enterprise to the State Capital Investment Corporation
Accumulated to date, SCIC has received the right to represent the
owners of state capital in more than 1,000 enterprises with a total value
of state capital received more than VND 9,900 billion (at the market
price of 15,000 billion dong), equivalent to nearly 1% of the total state
capital in enterprises, of which more than 80% are small inefficient
enterprises; the number of enterprises under special control, with losses
accounting for nearly 7%
28 trang |
Chia sẻ: honganh20 | Ngày: 22/02/2022 | Lượt xem: 358 | Lượt tải: 0
Bạn đang xem trước 20 trang tài liệu Restructuring state - Owned enterprises in the transition to market economy in Vietnam, để xem tài liệu hoàn chỉnh bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
d development economics.
- Research methods: Methods of classifying and systematizing
theory, methods of statistical analysis, synthesis methods, methods of
analysis and prediction
- Analytical framework of the thesis.
7
Chapter 2
THEORETICAL BASIS OF THE RESTRUCTURING
OF STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES
IN THE TRANSITION TO MARKET ECONOMY
2.1. State-owned enterprises in the process of moving to
market economy
2.1.1. State-owned enterprise basic concepts and characteristics
State-owned enterprise concepts and characteristics '
‘SOE is an enterprise with over 50% of charter capital owned by
the state to dominate the operation of the enterprise according to the
State's objectives, on the basis of compliance with market principles’.
Sourced: combined by the author
The characteristics of SOEs are shown in the following basic aspects:
+ Regarding ownership and management: SOEs are economic
organizations with over 50% - 100% of charter capital owned by the State.
+ Regarding the form of business organization: SOE is not a type of
enterprise, so it does not have its own organizational model. State-
owned enterprises are organized under the corporate regime, either as a
joint stock company or as a limited liability company.
+ Regarding main production and business field: through SOEs, the
State performs the function of providing goods and services that the
private sector does not want to do because of low profit, or is unable to
do because of large capital requirement, slow capital recovery, or
security and defense related fields, ensuring community benefits
+ Operational objectives: The operational objectives of SOEs are
the goals of the business owner.
+ Regarding corporate responsibility: A State enterprise is a legal
entity with limited liability for all production and business activities
within the amount of capital allocated by the State.
- The role of state-owned enterprises
The role of SOEs is shown in the following aspects:
State-owned enterprises play a key role in the economy.
+ A State enterprise is an economic organization of the State,
performing the role of the State, producing goods, providing services
8
for social needs, ensuring market stability.
+ State enterprises lead economic sectors outside the state sector (private
enterprises, collectives, individual business households) to develop
+ State enterprises create jobs and income for people, ensure social
stability.
2.1.2. Impacts of the transition to a market economy on SOEs
- Market economy and its impacts:
+ Market economy is a popular form of production organization in
both developed and developing countries. In essence, a market
economy is an economy in which market relations determine the
distribution of resources through the price system.
+ Basic characteristics of a market economy are shown in the
following aspects:
Firstly, the operating mechanism of the market economy is freedom
of competition
Secondly, a market economy is an economy based on a
synchronous market system and highly developed technical
infrastructure.
Thirdly, the market economy is a multi-ownership economy, with
many sectors and many actors participating.
- The effects of the transition to a market economy on SOEs
Process is a noun indicating the way to, or the process of carrying
out a job, according to a route or plan. In Latin, process is "processus",
reflecting movement, spontaneous events or a sequence of purposeful
manipulations.
The process of transitioning to the market economy of a country is the
milestones for each goal, to complete the tasks and assignments the State
need to do to perfect the market economy. In Vietnam, the transition to
market economy has been determined from 1986 to the present.
In a dynamic, creative and rapidly changing market economy, most
SOEs formed in the subsidy regime become quickly out of date,
stagnant, unable to keep up with management, sales and distribution.
SOEs invests spreadily, receives support from the state, causes
inequality, hinders the competitive motivation of the market economy.
To meet the requirements of market economy, the transition countries
9
have been taking steps to renovate their enterprises. The process of
SOE renewal and restructuring in Vietnam can be divided from 1986 up
to now into three phases:
The period from 1986 to 2000: During this period, SOEs were
clearly defined in terms of legal status, as well as the scope of the
business sector through the Law on State Enterprises (1995).
The 2001 - 2011 period: SOEs dominated key industries, sectors
and essential products of the economy, contributing mainly to the state
economy, managed to play its key role, stabilized and developed the
economy - society. Also during this period, debts from the SOE sector
that were unable to pay increased, labor shortage and a large surplus.
Therefore, there is a need to rearrange both public and business
enterprises.
The 2011 - 2021 period: This is a strategic breakthrough period,
socio-economic development orientation, growth model renewal,
economic restructuring is strong development of production forces,
construction. appropriate production relations, forming a synchronous
socialist-oriented market economy institution. Transforming the growth
model from mainly wide development to reasonable development
between width and depth, expanding the scale and focusing on
improving quality, efficiency and sustainability. To restructure the
economy, focusing on restructuring the production and service
industries suitable to the regions; accelerating corporate restructuring
and adjusting market strategies; rapidly increasing domestic value,
added value and competitiveness of products, enterprises and the whole
economy; developing knowledge economy. Based on the 3rd Central
Resolution, the XI Central Executive Committee (2011) on the
arrangement and renewal of SOEs, the Prime Minister signed the
Decision No. 929 / QD-TTg dated July 17, 2012 approving the project
"Restructuring state enterprises, focusing on economic groups, state
corporations in the period of 2011 - 2015". The project's objective is to
restructure SOEs to focus on key areas and to improve their
competitiveness. Through the implementation process, in 2017, the
Central Government issued Resolution No. 12-NQ / TW dated June 3,
2017 on continuing to restructure, innovate and improve the efficiency
10
of SOEs.
2.2. Restructuring state-owned enterprises in the transition to a
market economy
2.2.1. The concept and content of SOE restructuring in the
transition to a market economy
- The concept of SOE restructuring:
Restructuring SOEs or SOE restructuring is the organization of
business activities in a new way, in order to improve the operational
efficiency of enterprises.
Restructuring SOEs in transitioning countries to market economy is
solving weak problems, aiming to improve the operation of SOEs,
aiming to make these enterprises operate more efficiently.
Thus, the SOE restructuring in the transition to the market economy
is understood as all the innovations in the institution, law and
implementation of the allocation, management and use of state
resources invested in production and business at the enterprise
according to the market principle, in order to improve the economic
efficiency of these resources.
- SOE restructuring contents: SOE restructuring focuses on (i)
repositioning the role of the state economy, mainly SOEs; (ii) restructuring
the list of state assets in the enterprise; (iii) restructuring SOE governance
and (iv) restructuring SOE technology, products and services
Restructu
ring SOE
sector
Restructuring
SOE
governance
Repositioning the
role of SOEs
Restructuring
the list of State
assets in SOEs
Restructuring SOE
technology, products
and services
11
Figure 2.1: Framework for restructuring the SOE sector
2.2.2. Methods of restructuring state-owned enterprises in the
transition to a market economy
Methods of SOE restructuring include the following:
- Classification, arrangement, merger, amalgamation, dissolution,
bankruptcy of state-owned enterprises with ineffective or unprofitable
businesses, and transfer to other management agencies
- State-owned enterprise equitization
The equitization of SOEs is the most basic and important measure
in all forms of SOE restructuring.
- Selling loss-making and ineffective State-owned enterprises in
sectors and fields that the State does not need to keep
This measure has been implemented since the late 1990s and has
had a positive effect due to the complete transfer of ownership. In fact,
the delivery and sale is only taking place in local enterprises, small and
medium SOEs that are making losses. Therefore, this object is being
narrowed and appears less important in recent years.
- Transforming business model into limited liability company
Transforming SOEs into one-member limited liability companies
with the State-owned company management organization in order to
change the organizational structure and management according to the
market economy mechanism is appropriate innovation.
- Establishing an economic group and transformed into the parent
company - subsidiary model
The formation of parent companies - subsidiaries and economic
groups stems from the need to use the advantages of size and economic
advantage and financial capacity of key enterprises.
2.3. Factors affecting the restructuring of state-owned enterprises
2.3.1. Political factors
When determining the organizational form and implementation of
SOE restructuring, it must be in line with the State's socio-economic
construction and development orientations and objectives. The state
must determine the state owner's goals and steady roadmap for reform.
2.3.3. Economy
The level of perfection of the market economy and the stability and
development of the economy dominates the progress and efficiency of
12
SOE restructuring.
2.3.4. Competence of officials, civil servants and business
managers
Awareness capacity, attitudes, and responsibilities of the heads of
ministries, localities and business leaders are the strong dominant
factors in SOE restructuring.
2.3.5. International economic integration
International law and practice, the economic, political and
commercial situation of the region and the world dominate SOE
restructuring to different degrees, depending on the degree of
integration and participation in each country.
2.4. Experiences on restructuring state-owned enterprises of
some countries and lessons learnt for Vietnam
2.4.1. Experience of SOE restructuring of some countries in
the world
2.4.1.1. Experience in restructuring state-owned enterprises
in China
China's view of SOE reform is consistent with the socialist market
economy. In recent years, China has made a theoretical breakthrough in
SOE reform. Firstly, the theory of building a socialist market economy
with Chinese colors; secondly, the theory of ownership regime; thirdly,
the theory of the modern business regime. The basic content of the SOE
reform theory in China, in which the modern enterprise regime is the
focus, and enhancing the vitality and competitiveness of the SOEs is
the highest purpose.
2.4.1.2. Experience in reforming state-owned enterprises in Korea
The corporate sector restructuring is implemented through the
following measures:
Measure 1: Principle 5 + 3 for business restructuring process
Measure 2: Assign large corporations to consider restructuring
capital
Measure 3: Limit holding shares in other companies and guarantee
cross-debt
Measure 4: Eliminate weak companies and swap business between
large corporations
13
Measure 5: Restructuring corporate governance
2.4.2. Some lessons for Vietnam from foreign experiences on
SOE restructuring
Firstly, positioning the roles of SOEs in line with the practice of
market economic development.
Secondly, the law and law enforcement must be synchronous and
truly ensure equal competition between SOEs and other types of
enterprises.
Thirdly, the governance, management and administration of SOEs
must really follow the market mechanism, basing on business principles
Fourthly, not allowing the formation of relationships of interest,
profit from state capital and assets invested in production and business.
Chapter 3
ACTUAL SITUATION OF STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISE
RESTRUCTURING IN THE TRANSITION TO ECONOMY
MARKET IN VIETNAM FROM 2011-2020
3.1. The actual state of state-owned enterprises in the 2011 -
2020 period
According to the General Statistics Office, as of 2019, the total
number of enterprises in operation is over 714 thousand enterprises,
the number of operating enterprises with production and business
results is over 626 thousand enterprises. In which, SOEs account for
0.38% of the number of enterprises, 7.6% of employees, 28.6% of
total capital sources and 100% state-owned enterprises only had
already account for 0.18% of the number of enterprises, 4.3% of
employees, 12.9% of total capital.
In general, in the 2011-2020 period, SOEs have tried to perform
their assigned tasks, achieving many remarkable positive results,
ensuring the provision of many important products for economic
development such as energy, telecommunications, credit financing. The
total value of state equity is preserved and developed; the proportion of
SOEs losing money has decreased remarkedly; The rate of profitability
and employment efficiency of SOEs is higher than the average for the
14
entire enterprise sector.
However, the average growth quality and investment efficiency of
the SOE sector are still low: Over the past years, SOEs have had lower
growth rates in revenue and profit than those of operating capital.
Compared with non-state and FDI enterprises, SOEs have lower growth
rates of revenue and profits. In other words, SOEs are having to use
more capital to create 1 unit of output value, which is a factor that
reduces SOE investment efficiency.
3.2. Actual situation of state-owned enterprise restructuring in
the 2011-2020 period
3.2.1. Reposition the role of state-owned enterprises in the
restructuring process
In the 2011-2015 plan, SOEs are assigned a key role for the state
economy to play a key role, being an important material force for the
State to orient, regulate the economy and stabilize the macroeconomics.
In 2016, the XII Congress of the Party determined: "SOEs focus on
key and essential areas; important areas and national defense and
security; areas where enterprises of other economic sectors do not
invest”. The role of SOEs has changed. The basic and long-term
function of SOEs is no longer a tool of the State to lead the economy
and enterprises, but only focuses on the to ensure essential products and
services necessary for socio-economic development that other
economic sectors do not want or have not yet wanted to invest in
according to the market mechanism.
In that spirit, SOEs are gradually reducing their roles in for-profit
economic activities, only occupying a leading role in a number of key
economic sectors.
However, in the 2011-2020 period, SOEs still play a role and
account for a proportion in key economic sectors. Specifically: SOEs
play a large role in ensuring national energy security; For the petroleum
industry, Vietnam Petroleum Group Petrolimex accounts for about 50%
of the domestic retail market share; the proportion of SOEs in the
banking and finance sectors still maintains their dominant positions;
SOEs are playing a dominant role in telecommunications, information,
15
communication...
This shows that SOEs are still small in number in the economy but
still hold a very important role and account for a high proportion of the
country's resources, so the goal of minimizing the number of roles of
SOEs has not been achieved as the restructuring plan.
3.2.2. Restructuring the list of state assets in an enterprise
- Determine the list of enterprises that continue to maintain state
ownership: The SOE classification criteria have changed many times to
suit the role of SOEs in each period. In 15 years, from 2001 to 2016,
the Prime Minister issued six criteria to classify SOEs. The trend of
adjusting the SOE classification criteria is to reduce the number of
sectors and fields that maintain 100% state-owned enterprises, from
over 60 sectors and fields in 2002 to 11 sectors in 2016. On December 28,
2016 The Prime Minister issued Decision No. 58/2016 / QD-TTg on
criteria for classification of SOEs, state-owned enterprises and the list of
SOEs to implement the 2020 arrangement, in which the State only holds
100% of charter capital in 103 enterprises operating in 11 sectors.
Numer of enterprises
103
31
106
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
100% State
Capital
The state holding
over 50%
ownership
The state holding
under 50%
ownership
Charter Capital (billion VND)
561002
280353
174606
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
600000
100% State
Capital
The state
holding over
50% ownership
The state
holding under
50% ownership
Figure 3.1: Classification of SOEs in the 2016-2020 period
Implementing equitization and divestment of state capital over the
past time:
a) The results of equitization and divestment in the 2011-2015 period
The competent authority has approved the equitization plan of 508
16
enterprises, reaching over 98% of the plan (in 2011 it was 14
enterprises, in 2012 it was 26 enterprises, in 2013 it was 73 enterprises,
in 2014 it was 175. enterprises and in 2015, it was 220 enterprises). In
which, the State holds over 90% of charter capital in 5 enterprises, over
65% of charter capital in 108 enterprises, and over 50% of charter
capital in 154 enterprises.
Regarding divestment, the whole country has withdrawn VND
26,222 billion (book value), collected VND 36,537 billion (equal to
1.40 times of book value). In which: Divestment of investment outside
the industry (securities, banking, insurance, real estate, investment
funds) was VND 9,835 billion, earning VND 11,086 billion (equal to
1.1 times of book value), reaching 42% of the plan; transferring state
capital in enterprises that the State does not need to keep amounted to
VND 16,387 billion, earning 25,451 billion dong (equal to 1.6 times of
book value)
b) The results of equitization and divestment in the 2016-2020
period
The Prime Minister issued Document No. 991 / TTg-DMDN dated
July 10, 2017 on the list of 128 SOEs to be equitized to 2020 and
Decision No. 1232 / QD-TTg dated August 17, 2017 on the list of
Divestment by 2020 with the capital to be divested about 60 trillion
VND in 406 enterprises. The number of enterprises approved for the
equitization plan from 2016 to 2019 is 168 enterprises with the total
enterprise value of VND 443,056 billion, of which the value of state
capital is VND 206,694 billion. The total divested capital is VND
24,157 billion, earning VND 169,787 billion.
- Regarding the ownership policy for each state-owned enterprise
In fact, the restructuring period from 2011 to 2015 and from 2016
until now shows that, there has been no innovation in this content. The
determination of the annual tasks is mainly in the form of approving the
registration plans of the enterprises, which have not yet reflected the
responsibilities as well as the responsibility and expectations of the
owner agencies towards the affiliated SOEs.
With that mechanism, the ownership policy in SOEs is unclear,
incomplete and inconsistent to create a basis for a unified governance
17
framework. The content of the ownership policy (objectives,
requirements, monitoring and evaluation criteria ...) is separated,
divided and lacked coherence due to being placed in many forms of
documents. The mid and long-term goals of the owners for each SOE
are almost unknown, lacking quantitative indicators.
- Regarding the organizational apparatus to perform the state
owner function: Regarding the policies and laws, in the period of
restructuring 2011-2015 and from 2016 to now, there have been many
innovations in this content. Conclusion No. 40-TB / TW dated
September 14, 2017 of the Politburo on the project "Establish a
specialized agency to act as the owner representative for state-owned
enterprises and state capital in enterprises". Therefore, the Government
has established a Committee to manage state capital at enterprises
according to the Government's Resolution No. 09 / NQ-CP dated
February 3, 2018
- Regarding the transfer of the right to represent the owner of state
capital in an enterprise to the State Capital Investment Corporation
Accumulated to date, SCIC has received the right to represent the
owners of state capital in more than 1,000 enterprises with a total value
of state capital received more than VND 9,900 billion (at the market
price of 15,000 billion dong), equivalent to nearly 1% of the total state
capital in enterprises, of which more than 80% are small inefficient
enterprises; the number of enterprises under special control, with losses
accounting for nearly 7%.
- State-owned enterprise supervision: SOE supervision and monitor
of the management and use of state capital in enterprises still have
many shortcomings in terms of capital use, financial transparency, SOE
information, a major monitoring tool is SOE periodic reports, not
meeting the requirements of practice.
- Information disclosure and transparency of SOE operations: for
each SOE, the situation that enterprises do not disclose information or
delay information disclosure is still common.
- Regarding the management, administration and internal
restructuring mechanism in state-owned enterprises: the recent
regulations have clearly defined the functions, duties and powers of
18
SOE managers. The legal document system on the management of staff,
labor and wages in SOEs is relatively complete and comprehensive.
However, in general, the management and internal regulation of
many SOEs is a weak and slow stage. Labor governance within
enterprises is still weak, management qualifications, leadership and
corporate governance capacities of state-owned enterprise managers
are still limited.
- Regarding the tightening of financial discipline and budget
discipline for state-owned enterprises: the compliance has not followed
the principle of budget constraint and financial discipline for SOEs.
3.3. Evaluating the actual situation of SOE restructuring in the
2011-2020 period
3.3.1. Achievements
- Regarding the determination of the roles of SOEs: In the period
2011-2020, the 5 th Central Resolution XII no longer maintains that
SOEs must occupy the dominant market share with key products.
- Regarding divestment and equitization of SOEs: the
transformation of a 100% state-owned enterprise into a joint stock
company changes the structure and way of corporate governance;
Corporate governance model is organized more closely with many
systems of rules, principles and regulations to ensure effective
operation of the business; After equitization, investors and
shareholders are guaranteed to participate in corporate governance in
accordance with the law, and the interests of the state owner are
increasingly guaranteed ...
- Regarding SOE governance compared to international practice:
Regulations are relatively complete and synchronous on economic and
financial relations between the State and SOEs.
3.3.2. Limitations
- The role of SOEs has not yet met the requirements of the
restructuring process
- Equitization and divestment in state-owned enterprises are
still slow
- The SOE governance mechanism is slow to be reformed, is
inconsistent with international practices and standards, and the
19
transparency is limited.
3.3.3. Reasons
- Objective reasons: Due to the domestic market and the world
economy continuously having many fluctuations
- Subjective causes: The group of causes is from the institutions,
the SOE management and governance mechanisms; Some reasons stem
from internal SOEs
3.4. The problems posed to the restructuring of state-owned
enterprises in the coming time
Firstly, the socialist-oriented market economy that we are building
is a special economy.
Secondly, to develop Vietnam's economy, it is not possible to rely
solely on one economic sector, but to arouse all potentials and all
resourc
Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:
- restructuring_state_owned_enterprises_in_the_transition_to_m.pdf