The conclusion of this study advocated for all three hypotheses H1, H2, H3.
Accordingly, the overview of the integration has a positive impact in the short term,
while the financial integration, trade integration has a positive impact on economic
growth in Vietnam. Comparing this conclusion to previous studies also exists several
different points, as follows:
About global integration: The dissertation concludes that global integration
has a positive impact on economic growth in the short-term. This conclusion
conciliated with the conclusion of Dreher (2006), Suci et al. (2015), Tran Tho Dat and
Nguyen Thi Cam Van (2017). The practice shows that Vietnam has a significant
transformation since 1995 when Vietnam was a member of ASEAN. Focusing on
three pillars of cooperation: economic cooperation, cooperation on national security,
and cultural cooperation. ASEAN has been ranked as the most dynamic economic
region for about the past two decades by the United Nations
27 trang |
Chia sẻ: honganh20 | Ngày: 02/03/2022 | Lượt xem: 362 | Lượt tải: 0
Bạn đang xem trước 20 trang tài liệu Tóm tắt Luận án Economic integration, energy consumption and economic growth, để xem tài liệu hoàn chỉnh bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
In general, there are a few previous studies on the impact of the global
integration of economic growth. Although each study analyzed one type of
integration, the conclusions of the studies were similar. Most of the previous studies
confirmed that global integration has a positive impact on economic growth. So, the
dissertation assumed that economic integration would be a positive impact on
economic growth in the case of Vietnam.
The relationship between financial integration and economic growth
The relationship between financial integration and economic growth has
been well-known. However, the conclusion of the empirical studies is not consistent,
even directly debating.
Group 1: Group advocate financial integration
Acemoglu and Zilibotti (1997), Edison et al. (2002a) are the authors who
supported on financial integration. They believe that international financial
integration will facilitate risk sharing, expanding market-consuming, forming global
supply chains, thereby enhancing the specialization of production, allocation of
capital, and increasing the economic growth rate. Also, international financial
integration will improve the operation of the domestic financial system through
enhanced competitiveness and the development of financial services. Integration also
promotes economic growth by helping businesses reduce input costs (the rate of
borrow interest), increasing profits, and encouraging domestic investments.
The studies of Bonfiglioli (2008), Altomonte and Nicolini (2012) showed
that domestic businesses have to engage and compete with multinational enterprises;
they must improve competitiveness and improve productivity. The research of Bauer
et al. (2014) confirmed that domestic enterprises would restructure the cost and tax
obligations. Dreger and Zhang (2014), Samina et al. (2019) also said that developing
nations should be integrated to receive high technological machines from developed
countries. The study of Lawal et al. (2016), Saucier and Rana (2017); Boglioni (2018);
Danlami et al. (2018) were found when a country integrated into a worldwide; this
country can be received various advantages as improving the trade balance, expanding
the market and take part in international supply chains. Financial integration will boost
startup activities is the conclusion of Coulibaly et al. (2018).
Group 2: Group do not advocate financial integration
Lucas (1990) discovered a paradox (labeled is Lucas paradox). In the theory
of literature economic, the flow of capital must shift from the United States (the rich
capital) to India (the poor capital). However, the actual situation oppositely took place,
which means the capital flows from India to the United States. To explain the paradox,
Lucas (1990) believes that international capital does not flow to the undeveloped
countries due to which human capital and institutional quality are low. The market is
not perfect, and there is a lot of other risks that come from developing nations that do
not comply with its obligations and may sever the relationship with Investors.
The finding of Lucas has promoted the group from advocating financial
integration. Boyd and Smith (1992) stated that international financial integration in
weak institutional countries could lead to an amount of capital going out, from the
domestic to better institutional countries. Physical domestic capital should be scarce.
Rodrik (1998), Edwards (2001), Okada (2013) also said that high international
financial integration pushed emerging economies into a recession, the benefits are less
while the negative impacts are challenging to control. Emerging markets can be more
financially institutional, so it is highly susceptible to the volatility of the global
financial market, which is especially severe for countries with an open capital account.
Rahman and Shahari (2017), Vinh and Phong (2017), Trang and Kieu (2015) said that
financial integration would not be the same between developed countries and
developing countries due to countries have a different trade policy and amounts of
exchange reserves. With a little reserve, developing countries often slow/weak
response to the "economic shocks" or recession.
Group 3: Opposing groups and conditional groups
Edwards (2001) found that international capital flows will impact negative
economic growth in developed countries, but the positive impact on economic growth
in developing countries. However, Arteta et al. (2001), Edison et al. (2002b) state that
the empirical results of Edwards were not reliable because it does not satisfy the
stability test. In other studies, Quinn (1997) concluded that financial integration has a
positive impact on economic growth, but Kraay (1998), Arteta et al. (2001) confirmed
that the result of Quinn (1997) was not reliable.
Some studies have shown that the impact of financial integration on
economic growth only takes place under certain conditions. According to Bashar and
Khan (2007), financial integration has a positive effect on growth when the country
accumulates excellent human capital resources. Batuo et al. (2018), Pradhan et al.
(2018) believe that financial integration is only suitable for countries with an extensive
financial system and technology. Finally, the study of Ngo Hoang Trang and Nguyen
Thi Diem Kieu (2015) said that financial integration is only suitable for countries with
large amounts of exchange reserves.
The relationship between trade integration and economic growth
The relationship between trade integration and economic growth has also
been the many debates topic by the Economist. Disagreement is demonstrated in both
theoretical and empirical results. Baldwin and Seghezza (1996) said that trade
integration helped attract more capital for non-commercial areas. The domestic goods
will be cheaper and of higher quality. Trade integration reduces the price of the
imported machinery or material raw, which leads to a reduction in the business cost
for enterprises. Romer (1989), Danlami et al. (2018), Ma et al. (2019) showed that
trade integration could also impact economic growth through improved technology
due to the horizontal and longitudinal technological spreads in the same supply chain
or between global product supply chains together. Economic benefits at the scale of
research and development activities will be transferred gradually in the process of
investment reception, and interdependent in meeting the needs of customers.
Frankel and Cavallo (2008) claim that economies with sizeable commercial
integration often have to adjust the reduction of real rates to balance the current
account, so the negative consequence of lowering the price of the coin is less severe,
resulting in that country being less likely to break down. Besides, trade integration
also helps countries less vulnerable to negative implications of financial integration
when capital flows suddenly stop or fall into the financial crisis. Trade integration
helps to pay the external debt and avoid recession. However, no relationship between
trade integration and economic growth is the conclusion of Musila and Yiheyis (2015)
in the case of Kenya. Bolaky and Freund (2004) said that the magnitude of trade
integration would be more reliable in better institutional countries. Besides, there is a
significant concern that developed countries often play a dominant role in
international trade and investment organizations such as WTO, IMF. Some policies
or regulations issued by WTO, IMF have often brought many benefits to developed
countries.
2.3. A summary of previous studies on the relationship between energy
consumption and economic growth
Over the past four decades, the relationship between energy consumption
and economic growth was an interesting topic for researchers and policymakers.
Energy production is the spearhead industry in many countries. Moreover, energy
impacts both the total supply and the total demand in the economy. The directions that
the causal relationship between energy consumption and economic growth could be
categorized into four hypotheses, as follow:
The Conversation hypothesis: It suggests that the policy of conserving
energy consumption may be implemented with little or no adverse effect on economic
growth, such as in a less energy-dependent economy. The conservation hypothesis is
supported if an increase in real GDP causes an increase in energy consumption.
The Growth hypothesis: It implies that restrictions on the use of energy may
adversely affect economic growth, while increases in energy may contribute to
economic growth. The growth hypothesis suggests that energy consumption plays an
essential role in economic growth both directly and indirectly in the production
process as a complement to labor and capital. Consequently, we may conclude that
energy is a limiting factor to economic growth and, hence, shocks to energy supply
will harm economic growth.
The Feedback hypothesis: It implies that energy consumption and economic
growth are jointly determined and affected at the same time. Accordingly, increasing
the energy consumption at present will end economic growth at the next stages and
versa.
The Neutrality hypothesis: It implies that energy consumption is not
correlated with GDP, which means that neither conservative nor comprehensive
policies to energy consumption have any effect on economic growth. Thus, the
neutrality hypothesis is supported by the absence of a causal relationship between
energy consumption and real GDP.
To explain four hypotheses, Apergis and Payne (2009), Lee and Chang
(2007) claim that the demand for energy consumption depends on each stage of
development of the country. The development of a country could be divided into three
main stages:
Stage 1: Pre-industrial stage. Characteristics of this stage are the simple
production operation because it relies primarily on natural extraction. The majority of
people working in agricultural areas, machinery is not developed, should need to
consume energy for production, for the consumption of businesses/households in
general on a small scale.
Stage 2: Industrial stage. Features of this stage are the advancement of
science and engineering, and machinery is introduced into the production process,
replacing the skills of the workers increasingly. The increase in material wealth is also
synonymous with the consumption of more energy, emissions to the environment
more and more. The process of moving labor from agricultural to industrial sector
takes place on a full scale, forming clusters and industrial parks. The demand for
increased incomes is higher than the demand for quality of life. During this period,
the demand for energy consumption is a spike, and there are no signs of stopping.
Stage 3: Post-industrial stage. This period noted the remarkable
development of engineering science, and the economic structure shifted in direction
from industry to service. Along with improved income, the environmental protection
consciousness of people, businesses, and governments will be formed. They gradually
move forward to not accepting environmental quality changes do energy consumption
caused by economic growth. Energy consumption tends to reflow, diminishing, or
switching to consuming clean, more environmentally friendly energy.
Economic
growth
Pre-
Industrial
stage
Industry
stage Post-
Industrial
stage
Turning point Energy consumption
2.4. Research hypothesis
To conclude theoretical and experimental studies, combined with the
management of economic integration and energy consumption in Vietnam, the thesis
states that the following research theories:
Hypothesis H1: Global integration has a positive impact on economic growth
Hypothesis H2: Financial integration has a positive impact on economic growth
Hypothesis H3: Trade integration has a positive impact on economic growth
Hypothesis H4: Energy consumption has a positive impact on economic growth
Hypothesis H5: The impact of energy consumption on economic growth is
constant.
Hypothesis H6: The impact of energy consumption on economic growth is the
symmetrical impact.
2.5. Research gaps
In summary of experimental studies, the thesis found there were several
research flaws such as the following:
Firstly: Previous studies only analyze the individual impacts of each type of
economic integration to economic growth. The analysis provides an incomplete view
of all the impacts of economic integration. Most developing countries (inclusive
Vietnam) are simultaneously participating in three forms of integration: Global
integration, financial integration, and trade integration.
Secondly: Previous studies are based on a fundamental assumption that the
impact of energy consumption on growth is constant in all periods. Many factors
dominate economic activities. Thus, corresponding to each period is the scale of the
economy, each method of operation of different material production, i.e., economic
growth, or economic integration will be coordinated by the "threshold effect" of the
institutional quality or the rate of inflation level.
Thirdly: In addition to ignoring the threshold effect, previous studies for the
Vietnamese economy are based on the assumption that data not existent a "structural
breakpoints". In 1986-2018, Vietnam had two essential milestones in economic
integration: (i) In 1995, the United States banned economic sanctions, and Vietnam
was being joined as a member of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations; (ii) In
2008, Vietnam is an official member of the World Trade Organisation. Two events
may be the reason for believing that the assumption (not existent the structural
breakpoint) is yet to be reasonably.
Fourthly: Previous studies are based on the assumption that the impact of
energy consumption on economic growth is the symmetrical impact. That means the
increasing energy consumption and reducing energy consumption will impact
economic growth is the same. The assumption may not be practical because Vietnam
and the world economy have against some crises in the period 1971-2017.
Furthermore, high technology makes the machinery less energy-consuming, so the
contribution of energy consumption into economic growth tends to diminish.
CHAPTER 3: RESEARCH DESIGN
3.1. Research directions of the thesis
The dissertation was be divided into three directional research, as follow:
Detail:
Economic
integration
Energy
consumption
Economic
growth
2
1
3
1
3
2
Direction 1: The direction is designed to investigate the impact of economic
integration on economic growth both in the short term and long term.
Direction 2: The direction is designed to investigate the impact of energy
consumption on economic growth both in the short term and long term.
Direction 3: The direction is designed to investigate the impact of economic
integration, and energy consumption on economic growth both in the short term and
long term.
3.2. The research model for direction 1
0 1 2.t t t tLnGDP X UB u = + + + (Eq. 1)
0 1 2 3 4. . .( . ) .t t t t t t tLnGDP X DT X DT UB u = + + + + + (Eq. 2)
Notes: UB is the rate of urbanization; it plays the role of the control variable.
ut is the error. Xt is global integration (labeled KOF), financial integration (labeled
IFI), or trade integration (labeled OPEN). DT is a dummy variable (before "structural
breakpoint" is 0, after "structural breakpoint" is 1). Annual data are collected from
1986 to 2018. "Ln" is the logarithm.
3.3. The research model for direction 2
0 1 2 3 4. . .( . ) .t t t t t t tGDP X DT X DT UB u = + + + + + (Mô hình 3)
0 1 2 3. . .t t t t tGDP ECcapita Oilcapita UB u = + + + + (Mô hình 4)
Notes: Notes: UB is the rate of urbanization; it plays the role of the control
variable. ut is the error. In Eq. 3, Xt is the average petroleum consumption per capita
Oilcapita (to analyze the impact of petroleum consumption on growth), Xt is the
average electricity consumption per capita (to analyze the impact of electricity
consumption on growth). DT is a dummy variable (before "structural breakpoint" is
0, after "structural breakpoint" is 1). Annual data are collected from 1971 to 2017.
3.4. The research model for direction 3
0 1 2 3. . .t t t t tLnGDP LnIFI LnEC UB u = + + + + (Eq. 5)
Note: Notes: UB is the rate of urbanization; it plays the role of the control
variable. ut is the error. The LnIFI variable is the logarithm of financial integration,
and the LnEC variable is the logarithm of electricity consumption per capita. Annual
data are collected from 1986 to 2017.
3.5. Sources of data
Annual data for economic growth are collected from the World Bank (WB),
International Energy Agency (IEA), United Nations Conference on Trade and
Development (UNCTAD), and Swiss Economics Studies.
3.6. Methodology
The dissertation applies some econometric technical approach, as follows:
The Ordinary Least Square regression (OLS), Threshold regression (TR),
Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) approach, Nonlinear Autoregressive
Distributed Lag (NARDL) approach, and the Toda and Yamamoto (1995) causality
test.
CHAPTER 4: EMPIRICAL RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
4.1. A brief of economic growth, integration, and energy consumption in
Vietnam in the period of 1971-2018.
Regarding economic integration, according to the Vietnam Chamber of
Commerce and Industry (VCCI) after the economic innovation in 1986, Vietnam's
economy has gradually entered into the regional/world economy. In 1995, Vietnam
was being joined as an official member of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations.
In 2008, Vietnam was an official member of the World Trade Organization (WTO).
By March 05/2019, Vietnam has signed 12 bilateral and multimodal free trade
agreements, which are negotiating four agreements. One hundred twenty-six
countries/territories have foreign direct investment projects in Vietnam, and Vietnam
has trade relations with about 178 countries/territories around the World. Economic
integration is being given the support of Government and administrator in Vietnam.
Regarding energy consumption, the increase in economic growth leads to an
increase in energy consumption. However, electricity consumption per capita is too
high. To make 1 unit of products, Vietnam has to spend power output almost three
times more than the Chinese and Asian countries.
Vietnam has been negatively affected by the regional economic crises of
Asian in 1997 and the World in 2008, but the economy is still growing drastically
throughout the 1986-2018 period, with many positive transitions in quantity and
quality. According to the World Bank, income per capita has increased by nearly six
times, from 391 (USD/person/year) in 1986 to 1.965 (USD/person/year) in 2018 (at a
fixed price in 2010). Vietnam is ranked as a developing country since 2012.
4.2. The empirical result of direction 1
Table 1. The impact of integration on growth in the long term
Variables Coefficient Std.Error P-value
KOF -0,0147 0,0220 0,513
DT 1,1953 0,8458 0,177
KOF_DT -0,0245 0,0217 0,274
UB 0,1449 0,0650 0,041
Intercept 0,4259 0,2894 0,161
LnIFI 0,1059 0,0345 0,008
DT 3,3715 1,1336 0,009
LnIFI_DT -0,3458 0,1201 0,011
UB 0,1207 0,0219 0,000
Intercept 0,4859 0,2419 0,063
OPEN 0,0248 0,0078 0,006
DT 1,5102 0,5274 0,013
OPEN_DT -0,0203 0,0074 0,016
UB 0,0402 0,0092 0,001
Intercept 0,8994 0,2097 0,001
The result in table 1 showed that global integration (KOF variable) harm
growth, but not yet significant. The financial integration and trade integration has a
positive impact on economic growth at a 1% level significant. The LnIFI_DT variable
and the OPEN_DT variable have a negative impact. That means both of the financial
integration, and trade integration will boost economic growth in the case of Vietnam.
However, the size of the impact trend to diminish after 1995 (there is a "breakpoint"
in 1995).
4.3. The empirical result of direction 2
Table 2. The impact of energy consumption on growth in the long term
The result of electricity consumption by ARDL approach
Variables Coefficient Std.Error P-value
ECcapita 0,9904 0,2098 0,000
DT 110,74 26,935 0,000
EC_DT -0,9178 0,1976 0,000
UB 81,440 5,1313 0,000
Intercept -625,45 137,70 0,000
The result of electricity consumption by NARDL approach
ECcapita_POS 0,1024 0,0291 0,001
ECcapita_NEG -6,9053 3,5553 0,061
The result of petroleum consumption by ARDL approach
Oilcapita -267,97 166,16 0,115
DT -4,1862 75,667 0,956
Oil_DT 61,937 175,27 0,726
UB 137,03 27,523 0,000
Intercept -322,29 97,904 0,002
The result of petroleum consumption by NARDL approach
Oilcapita_POS 114,265 46,809 0,020
Oilcapita_NEG -58,943 19,878 0,006
Table 2 showed that the impact of electricity consumption on economic
growth is a positive and asymmetrical impact by both of ARDL and NARDL
approach. Petroleum consumption has a positive impact on growth in the long term.
The impact of petroleum consumption is also asymmetry. Accordingly, the impact of
increasing petroleum on growth is stronger than decreasing petroleum.
4.4. The empirical result of direction 3
Table 3: The impact of integration and energy consumption on growth
Variables Coefficient Std.Error P-value
The empirical result by OLS regression
LnIFI 0,0205 0,0030 0,000
LnEC 0,3725 0,0243 0,000
UB 0,0115 0,0047 0,020
Intercept 4,1671 0,0318 0,000
The empirical result by ARDL approach
LnIFI 0,0283 0,0123 0,035
LnEC 0,2219 0,0718 0,007
UB 0,0283 0,0106 0,017
Intercept 1,8936 0,6860 0,014
R_square = 0,87, Adj R_square = 0,78
ECM = LnGDP - [0,0283.LnIFI + 0,2219.LnEC + 0,0283.UB + 1,8936]
The results in table 3 showed that both economic integration and energy
consumption have a positive impact on economic growth in the case of Vietnam over
the period 1986-2017.
4.5. Discussion
Discussion to the relationship between economic integration and economic
growth
The conclusion of this study advocated for all three hypotheses H1, H2, H3.
Accordingly, the overview of the integration has a positive impact in the short term,
while the financial integration, trade integration has a positive impact on economic
growth in Vietnam. Comparing this conclusion to previous studies also exists several
different points, as follows:
About global integration: The dissertation concludes that global integration
has a positive impact on economic growth in the short-term. This conclusion
conciliated with the conclusion of Dreher (2006), Suci et al. (2015), Tran Tho Dat and
Nguyen Thi Cam Van (2017). The practice shows that Vietnam has a significant
transformation since 1995 when Vietnam was a member of ASEAN. Focusing on
three pillars of cooperation: economic cooperation, cooperation on national security,
and cultural cooperation. ASEAN has been ranked as the most dynamic economic
region for about the past two decades by the United Nations.
About financial integration: The dissertation concludes that financial
integration has a positive impact on economic growth both in the short term and long
term. This conclusion is similar to the study of Zhang and Matthews (2019), Ghosh
(2019), Vinh and Phong (2017) for Asian countries, the study of Danlami et al. (2018)
for the Nigeria economy, the study of Rahman and Shahari (2017) for Asian+3
countries. But again, the conclusion of Vo Xuan Vinh and Duong Hoai Anh (2017),
the study of Musila and Yiheyis (2015) for the Kenyan economy in the period 1982-
2009. The author argues that the dissertation is consistent with the socio-economic
practices of Vietnam because Vietnam is the following developed country. It is
necessary to make the most of the advantages of geographical location, natural
resources, and the trend of capital and technology movement of the World. Thanks to
the economic integration, Viet Nam has consistently sustained political stability,
income per capita is improved, the rate of growth is always higher than 5% per year,
attracting foreign direct investment is always greater than 10 billion per year during
the period from 2008 to present, despite the overwhelming impact from the global
financial crisis of 2008.
About trade integration: The dissertation concludes that trade integration has
a positive impact on economic growth both in the short term and long term. This
conclusion was similar to the study of
Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:
- tom_tat_luan_an_economic_integration_energy_consumption_and.pdf